Forum
Logo
banner

Login to Rethos
Email:
Password:

Not a Rethos citizen?
Not a member? sign up now
11:56 AM, MARCH 31, 2008
Blog Blog 
Ipod_nation_rethos_inline

I was watching some people on the bus the other day and noticed that nobody was talking to anyone else.  This is the same scene that I see every day while taking public transportation, but I was more observant that day about my fellow passengers, having left the book that I had intended to read at home on the kitchen table.  More than half of the passengers had some personal data device to occupy their attention.  Two people had cell phones, one had a gaming device, and twelve people were enveloped in the bubble of sound created by their ipods.  When I noticed how alone they were in the music that only they could hear, and how alone we all were sitting next to eachother on the bus, I thought: isn't it funny how some things are labelled so appropriately? 

"ipod".  "I" is the operative and descriptive part of the label of this small device.  If I am listening to an ipod not only am "I" listening to music alone and shutting out everyone else, but "I" am also in complete control of what I listen to, and nothing unique nor surprising is going to enter my ears or my mind.  "I" choose my playlist, from artists and song choices I have already been exposed to.  "I" will never be exposed to new sounds or concepts or issues or creativity, if I choose not to be.  This is the aspect of the culture of our technology that is most disturbing.  It signals the advent of a greater isolation than just having little soundnubs in our ears.

Music is more than just entertainment.  Music is a symbolic representation of the mood of an era, it is an agent of catharsis and change; music allows us to experience life more fully and sometimes, music changes us, as individuals, in radical ways.  Music is also something that has been shared at a communal level for eons:  how each generation passed along it's beliefs, it's faiths, it's awareness of itself and the world.   In some more recent generations, music has shifted the entire paradigm of our shared reality.  Can anyone think of the 1920s, the 1940s or the 1960s without thinking of the music of those days and how massive groups of people embraced ideals and were motivated to work within the framework of a "Bigger Picture"?

When everyone has their own playlist programmed into a machine that only has one audience, we walk away from the communal pool of culture.  We declare our individuality as a sovereign state and end the union of our personal culture with that of our society.

When we take away the power of the unknown and eliminate surprise from what we experience of the world, we voluntarilly become limited beings.   We make our minds and hearts small.  We place a cap on our consciousness.  Some of the most powerful influences that shaped me came in the form of music.  Music that I had never heard before, music that came to me through tuning into the radio; that travelled the airwaves from Montreal, New York, and Burlington, VT.  It took a lot of attention to learn the songs, discover the artists, and absorb the messages.  The fire of activism and an awareness of layers of reality were lit up in my mind by songwriters such as Bruce Cockburn, Adrian Belew, early Peter Gabriel, Pete Seeger, a not-quite-famous U2, and an as yet unknown band from Athens Georgia called REM.  Independent radio stations still existed in large numbers and they played much more diverse selections than top 40 or pop radio stations who were dependent upon big corporations for their funding.  The new, the old, and the classic came washing through my adolescent attention.  And when I shared what I heard with others, I found that these sounds were something sublime, shaping our ideals, our world concept, our intention.  We were united by something larger then ourselves: a shared understanding of how we wanted the world to be.  What happens to the potential of that communal comprehension when we turn on and tune in only to our personal preferences and drop out of the shared reception zone?     

Do we become disconnected?  Disjointed?  Dysfunctional?  Dis-harmonious?

The technology behind these little machines is not inherently negative.  The tendency to hide behind it and shut out all other human beings, is.  Increasingly we are capable of making the choice to isolate.  Personal computing at the laptop, meals for one in the microwave, one person in one car driving to work, cell phones in every pocket, and one set of tiny soundnubs in one pair of ears emitting sounds that only one person can hear, tailored to one person's taste.

 

One of the best surprise discoveries of my life that came by way of music was a song by George Harrison that contained the refrain: "...tell me, who am I, without you?..."  That's a good question.  I think that "i" will start a conversation the next time I travel on the bus and forever leave that book at home.     

 

 

 

"ipod' is a registered trademark of Apple, Inc.

Lyrics: "What is Life" by George Harrison c. 1970 from the album All Things Must Pass

 

 

 

Rating:
mostly loved
(by 1 user)  

8 PREVIOUS COMMENTS

Dsc02675_thumb APR 12, 2008
james emmans
I noticed on London Underground people are looking more happy than they were 10 years ago - i think it is the new arrivals that have helped. Another observation is the book reading - I turned to see 5 people in a row all with open book - some maybe on quite short journeys.
From_the_heart_of_the_world_thumb APR 12, 2008
Li Li Parsons
James,
This is a good thing, and it's the blessing or benefit of such technology. I love music and I love literature. Both modes of expression enrich us in ways we can't even begin to measure! I am cautious, however, of those things we use to make ourselves "content" at the expense of losing our integration with our greater community. Thanks for the feedback!
Rethosdefaultavatar_small APR 13, 2008
Richard Treadwell
In the end I'm pretty sure this technology will allow us to keep and create more connections. People put up with crappy commercial radio because the radio brings them something new, so when wifi becomes ubiquitous, media devices will stream radio from around the globe.

I find that most people on buses in Houston don't have any books or headphones, yet continue to sit in silence. We just see so many strangers throughout the day we become desensitized to the presence of other people. This phenomenon began with the industrial revolution and the need for cities and mass transportation.

People desire only so many people in their social network, some more than others of course, and small talk can often be more uncomfortable than just sitting there...although sometimes it's nice to branch out and make a connection with a stranger.

Anyway, my point is connections can be made in situations one feels a sense of commonality, a social event, a concert, a club, a library even. Mass transportation is more a means than a destination, as such it doesn't really foster an atmosphere of sociality.

Besides, most people download songs they hear from their friends, the radio, suggestions from itunes...playlists are far from static.

Perhaps you are perceiving a greater isolation, apart from these devices, wrought by a dysfunctional political and economic system, and it is symbolized on the bus, together in our aloneness.
From_the_heart_of_the_world_thumb APR 14, 2008
Li Li Parsons
Richard,
You write so thoughtfully and eloquently about a point I had not really considered when I wrote this article: you state "people only desire so many people in their social network, some more than others...", and this is very true. I suppose it is even more true in our modern era than it was in previous ones, before industrialization and before we became inundated by sensory input. So much is asked of people in the West: time, energy, attention all go towards material security and accumulation... and most people work around other people that they otherwise would not have any association with. When we are in an enforced community and are kept so busy in meaningless pursuits, I suppose that a little alone time is healthy, even if one is alone only in their own head, with their own senses. What looks like isolation, could at times actually be much needed solitude. Peace of mind. Stillness of heart. Thank you for writing a response and making me think again about my words and my assumptions!
Rethosdefaultavatar_small APR 18, 2008
John Zeger
I completely agree with you Li Li. I am also disappointed by the younger generation that I see on the bus and elsewhere that choose to shut themselves off from opportunities to interact with others as they caccoon themselves in their music with Ipods and other things plugged into their heads. The world is getting less and less friendly all the time!
Rethosdefaultavatar_small APR 18, 2008
Ian Cole
Great article. You’re right about the “i” phenomenon, it does put people in their own little “pod”. It IS concerning that it could be cutting people off meeting people. I mean, would YOU try to start a conversation with someone busy with their tech toy? I was actually thinking that yesterday as I watched people in a park and on a popular street in the University area of Edmonton Alberta. I saw people with earbuds in and out in a social setting and wondered how they expect to meet people if they couldn't hear someone say "hi" to them. I wondered if they even thought of it. And true, as Richard pointed out - sometimes it IS "me" time. Good point.
But as far as social networks are concerned, I thought the networks were going to let us meet each other more easily. What happened?
I joined a few networks just looking for friends or activity partners, but found people don't actually meet much. Of all the ones I joined only one boardgame group panned out and after just a year it recently folded. 40 people joined the group online and 3 regularly showed up... I found that people chat and send things, and that’s nice, but the meeting ends up being put off - permanently. Now I don't even use them because I want to get out, not stay in. I suspect people are staying in more and getting out less because they are constantly trying to arrange their meetings.
Dating sites are different. Meeting people is easy there.
Using the internet as a method of meeting people is good, but not as the ONLY way. The problem with social networks - and any site for that matter - is that they need people ON them to succeed. I know, I'm a partner in some sites. That's the goal. That is why we are IN more and OUT less. We need to be ON these networking sites to meet people.
I got thinking about that, and that we need to get back to meeting people in public again. I wanted to be able to USE the internet to meet people in a way that we didn't actually NEED to be ON it all the time. I wondered if I could create a social network that would exist in the real world, but have a virtual presence just to explain it and so people would know it exists and let them join so they can see other people doing it. I revived an idea I had 15 years ago but never pursued. Girls were wearing big o rings as bracelets and I thought that the little o ring could be used as a friendship ring. I recently created OhRings.net on that very premise. “a little black o ring on your finger is all you need to show you’re friendly”. This is a HUGE departure from internet social networks because it lets people "off the hook" of the intenet and takes their network into the real world – the one we live in – and lets people meet in person again. It makes use of the internet as a means to an end, not the "be all end all". OhRings is the ONLY link between ViRTuaL and ReAliTy. So now, if someone is using their ipod you can still approach them if you see they’re wearing an OhRing because if they have it on it means they want to meet people. Nice…
Defimage1_thumb APR 18, 2008
JustinTruax
I agree with you to a very little extent. Yes, from the ages 4-12 I believe they don't need to be so secluded from society. They need to meet new friends and learn more and everything. At one point though, you get to the age where you don't want to take part in a world so corrupt full of lies and killing.

So you turn on your I-pod, it's a nice way to get away from EVERYTHING that is bothering you. Because music in reality is the best escape for anybody. We listen to it for relaxation, we listen to it for distraction, we listen to it for anything really.

Another thing is that with the world today, you can't really NOT be doing something technological. Because most of the time people are used to other people snapping back at them if they start talking to a stranger.

I live in Toronto where I run the risk of getting stabbed, shot or beat up everyday... You really think I'm going to take the chances of just walking up to some random guy and saying "hey! what are you listening to... here is what I'm listening to..." I'll be dead in 5 seconds or less.

So no, instead I'm just going to chill by myself in my own little world. While the outside world keeps getting worse day by day until the inevitable end.
From_the_heart_of_the_world_thumb APR 19, 2008
Li Li Parsons
JustinTruax: I respect your choices and your opinion... for a more thoughtful response to your comment, check out my comment over at the blog "Technology: Isolating us or keeping us safe?" by pinksiete.

FEATURED NEWS
Santropol Roulant
Posted By: Fernando   Sep 20, 2008
Audio_video
  fon...
UNIVERSAL ACTION NOW: RIP HIV
Posted By: Tamsin Smith   Aug 04, 2008
Blog
; f...
Olney, Maryland Resident Journeys to India to Help Wastepickers
Posted By: The Advocacy Project   Jul 31, 2008
Blog
I am spending the summer in the slums of New...
Grieving Relatives Seek Closure as University Massacre Victims are Reburied in Peru, July 18, 2008
Posted By: The Advocacy Project   Jul 22, 2008
Article
July 18, 2008, Lima, Peru: The remains of ni...
Carbon-Free Does NOT Require Nuclear
Posted By: Richard Treadwell   Jul 17, 2008
Article
Many prominent science magazines argue that ...

MOST VIEWED
Abuse Your Friend's Toilets
Posted By: Christopher   Sep 02, 2007
Blog
Abue Your Friend's Toilets<...
Forget the Electric Car: This one runs on compressed air!
Posted By: Alec Henderson   Jan 12, 2008
Article
When I first saw this article I thought it w...
Don't drink the water!
Posted By: Will   Sep 07, 2007
Article
Bottled water is healthy water – right?</p...
The Meat Industry and the Environment
Posted By: Christopher   Sep 02, 2007
Blog
Here are only a few facts from the November ...
Digging deep for capitalism
Posted By: Patrick Scott   Nov 08, 2007
Blog
Mining and particularly the mining of precio...

HIGHEST RATED
Cause of Severe Hunger
Posted By: Amy's Hunger Awareness   Aug 29, 2007
Article
The cause of most hunger stems from some dis...
Race and Urban Poverty
Posted By: Ending Urban Poverty   Aug 29, 2007
Blog
Poverty twice as likely for minority ethnic ...
Homelessness
Posted By: Ending Urban Poverty   Aug 29, 2007
Blog
Homelessness is the condition and societal c...
How weird
Posted By: Jason Boyer   Aug 29, 2007
Blog
So, the world goes viral and a huge amount o...
Biodiversity Hotspots
Posted By: Evan   Aug 30, 2007
Blog
Some parts of the world with so much flora a...